The judge found that the old boundary and the new boundary were to be parallel. However, the
old boundary was never fixed, so this finding, in the judge’s words “carried the matter no
further”.
Similar Posts
Pennock v Hodgson [2010] EWCA Civ 873
The parties’ neighbouring properties were in common ownership before division occurred and the question of the boundary could arise. At the respective…
Melhuish v Fishburn [2008] EWCA Civ 1382
This is an appeal by the claimant, Gordon Melhuish, from a judgment of HHJ Reed QC given in the Guildford County Court…
Sparling v Norman [2014] EWCA Civ 1152
LORD JUSTICE ELIAS: The appellant and his wife own and occupy Hebron FarmCottage in Carmarthenshire. The respondents, Mr and Mrs Norman, are…
Nata Lee Ltd v Abid [2014] EWCA Civ 1652
County Court on 5th November 2013, in which she made detailed declarations after aliability-only trial of a claim by the respondents, Mr….
Alan Wibberley Building Ltd v Insley (29 April 1999)
HOUSE OF LORDS Lord Browne-Wilkinson Lord Lloyd of Berwick Lord Hoffmann Lord Hope of Craighead Lord Clyde OPINIONS OF THE LORDS OF…
Pollock v Oldfield [2018] EWHC 2743 (Ch)
Boundaries: hedge on bank; stock-proof fences; appealing factual findings Facts: A boundary dispute arose in relation to a boundary between what had,…
