The judge found that the old boundary and the new boundary were to be parallel. However, the
old boundary was never fixed, so this finding, in the judge’s words “carried the matter no
further”.
Similar Posts
Parmar v Upton [2015] EWCA Civ 795
This appeal is mainly about the application to a particular set of facts of the pair of rebuttable presumptions which conveyancers call…
Pennock v Hodgson [2010] EWCA Civ 873
The parties’ neighbouring properties were in common ownership before division occurred and the question of the boundary could arise. At the respective…
Alan Wibberley Building Ltd v Insley (29 April 1999)
HOUSE OF LORDS Lord Browne-Wilkinson Lord Lloyd of Berwick Lord Hoffmann Lord Hope of Craighead Lord Clyde OPINIONS OF THE LORDS OF…
Nata Lee Ltd v Abid [2014] EWCA Civ 1652
County Court on 5th November 2013, in which she made detailed declarations after aliability-only trial of a claim by the respondents, Mr….
Melhuish v Fishburn [2008] EWCA Civ 1382
This is an appeal by the claimant, Gordon Melhuish, from a judgment of HHJ Reed QC given in the Guildford County Court…
Pollock v Oldfield [2018] EWHC 2743 (Ch)
Boundaries: hedge on bank; stock-proof fences; appealing factual findings Facts: A boundary dispute arose in relation to a boundary between what had,…
