County Court on 5th November 2013, in which she made detailed declarations after a
liability-only trial of a claim by the respondents, Mr. and Mrs. Abid, against the
defendant, Nata Lee Limited, for trespass and interference with a right of way. After a
three-day trial the judge found for the claimants broadly on all the heads of their claim,
and gave case management directions for the necessary further hearing as to remedies.
Similar Posts
Parmar v Upton [2015] EWCA Civ 795
This appeal is mainly about the application to a particular set of facts of the pair of rebuttable presumptions which conveyancers call…
Pennock v Hodgson [2010] EWCA Civ 873
The parties’ neighbouring properties were in common ownership before division occurred and the question of the boundary could arise. At the respective…
Joyce v Rigolli [2004] EWCA Civ 79
The judge found that the old boundary and the new boundary were to be parallel. However, theold boundary was never fixed, so…
Ali v Lane [2006] EWCA Civ 1532
Dispute between two adjoining land-owners This is the latest stage in a long running dispute between two adjoining land-owners overan area of…
Alan Wibberley Building Ltd v Insley (29 April 1999)
HOUSE OF LORDS Lord Browne-Wilkinson Lord Lloyd of Berwick Lord Hoffmann Lord Hope of Craighead Lord Clyde OPINIONS OF THE LORDS OF…
Melhuish v Fishburn [2008] EWCA Civ 1382
This is an appeal by the claimant, Gordon Melhuish, from a judgment of HHJ Reed QC given in the Guildford County Court…
