Claimants wished to carry out extensive works of development and refurbishment to their property, works which included the construction of a multi-layered…
Claimants wished to carry out extensive works of development and refurbishment to their property, works which included the construction of a multi-layered basement development, including lifts to take cars to underground parking, a sub-level swimming pool, and a sunken garden to the rear of the property.
Injunction against surveyors after settlement agreement between parties; whether a dispute still existed for the purposes of section 10.
Application of section 10(4) of the Act – appointing the ‘other side’s surveyor’; invalid Addendum Award. This case raises an interesting point…
Judgment on the application by Mr Alister Redler to discharge a witness summons It concerns an award made by one of the…
Plaster is structural for purposes of implied terms under the Act; disturbance; loss of amenity and inconvenience claim; alternative accommodation cannot constitute…
Selection of third surveyor; estoppel; enforcement costs. Miss Reeves wished to demolish a single storey rear extension to her property and replace…
Lacey v Baker 17 May 2019 This case came before the court initially as a party wall appeal, but was followed by…
Assessment of damages taking into consideration diminution of adjoining owner’s property and findings of Trespass. This appeal relates to a dispute between…